I teach college. I've been at it for about twenty years. It was and remains the one job I've sought and desired. Some kids grow up wanting to jump out of airplanes, quarterback a football team, or become President. Once I arrived at Wabash, I knew I wanted to
follow in the footsteps of those teaching me.
Cutting to the current semester, my Ethics and Values students will be contributing posts to a course blog. (Sorry--this will be a private, students-only blog not available on Blogger or anywhere else.) To give them some idea of what I had in mind, I drummed up the following. It runs on *much* longer than what they're expected to do, but it hopefully establishes some parameters.
For those who find this stuff interesting, please add a comment. Before you get angry, though, do remember here I'm blogging for a student audience.
If you want something done right....
do it yourself. Or at least show folks what you have in mind.
So
here goes. Curious about this blog assignment? Read through this once
or twice and then construct your own. My first post (because who knows?
maybe I'll post a couple more...) will be longer than your 150-250 word
requirement.
First, a couple things: a) social media--if you're
on Facebook and/or Twitter, feel free to connect at www.facebook.com/pages/Spiritual-Diabetes/ and @SpiritualDiabet. I have
another blog at http://spiritualdiabetes.blogspot.com/.
You are not required any of these. Just FYI... b) keep the old 1980s song in mind: "
Show me, Don't Tell me";
work on weaving together your argument with the sources you use. Embed
your link (so we can access it) and then start commenting. That's the
"show"; if it's just a rant, then you're merely "telling."
Second,
OK, so much in the news to discuss and so little time and space.
Sorry, there will be no discussions of Taylor Swift's switch to pop
music or comments about the Kardashians. (Hint--you shouldn't either.)
Here are two article to mull over. First,
Dr. Tim Muldoon at Boston College muses about the new semester's beginning, and particularly so at a Catholic university.
"Catholic education," broadly speaking and, this is important,
regardless of major, should do more way more than make us employable.
It should make us
free. Free
from:
- Popular opinion
- Childishness
- The myopia of the “now”
- Slavish dependence on technology for happiness
- [The student's own] undisciplined desires
- Approval of others
- The hope for wealth
At
first glance this seems to me a long way of saying "being free means
growing up." 7th graders live in the eternal now; once you hit 18 (or
perhaps earlier) and have one wit of maturity you realize you can't
always live in ignorance of what your actions might bring. Further, it
shouldn't take much to understand we all have undisciplined desires and
that, jeez, maybe we should try a little (self) discipline. Muldoon is
not the stereotypical cranky conservative Catholic. Far from it--but he
does make an important point about self-realization. The same applies
to freedom from popular opinion and external approval. Regardless of
religion or lack thereof, we all basically "get" the insight that we all
need to develop the strength of conviction to do what's right.
Without, of course, falling into plain old stubbornness.
Catholic education should, Muldoon adds, also free us
for:
- Giving of themselves to others
- Authentic friendship
- Civic responsibility
- Self-understanding
- Indifference toward money
- Understanding of the world and history
Hard
to disagree with that list, too. Being moral and studying ethics
should lead to both renewed (or perhaps re-appreciated) internal
(friendship) and external (civic responsibility) relationships. It's
supposed to make us "better," isn't it?
Feeling allergic to the
"Catholic" part? Not to worry--that's part of Muldoon's argument.
That word--"catholic"--means "universal" in Greek, and implies a broad
inclusivity. That is, lots of people can do this...
and should.
Notice how his list is devoid of any specific reference to Christian
faith. Can Catholic education bring about conversion? You're darned
right it can--and in fact it should, but, and this is the important
point, it does so through the pursuit of more important "
first things:"
virtue, justice, prudence, temperance, courage, mercy, hope. So you
can major in whatever you majoring in (business, education, health
sciences, etc.) and still benefit from these freedoms. Not everybody
needs to or will discern a vocation to religious life. In fact,
Catholic education, you'll see Muldoon arguing, education works best
when students go onto different jobs and careers. The key, he notes, is
discernment. For those who believe wondering if I've gutted the religious component, fear not. First, note Muldoon's reliance on
St. Ignatius of Loyola (1491-1556),
a great reformer and spiritual guide, indicates a judicious balance
between Christian spiritual goals and an imminently practical "how can
we make this work?" groundedness. (Also, in case you didn't know,
Pope Francis is a Jesuit,
a member of the Society of Jesus,
which St. Ignatius founded.) Second, as you'll see later this
semester, Roman Catholic Christianity advances a nuanced argument about
truth that involves philosophical and theological/spiritual paths. So
something "Catholic" will be, simultaneously, inclusive/universal and
particular (Christian!).
Read more:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thecapstone/2014/09/the-discerning-university/#ixzz3CRtCjVb3
ALSO--and
did I not tell you this would run on much longer than what you're
required to do?--how about religious violence in the Middle East?
The jihadist terror group ISIL
has made several headlines for their barbaric practices of beheading or
crucifying victims (Americans, yes, but Iraqis and Syrians). But how
to respond? Again, as we'll see later this semester, there is a
long-standing "just war" school of thought that lays out--along both
philosophical and Christian theological guidelines--parameters for
sanctioning fatal conflict. (If you've watched movies ranging from
Black Hawk Down to
Generation Kill,
you'll recognize the references to the ROE--"rules of engagement.")
Some Christians would rather take the Bible's "Blessed are the
peacemakers" (Matthew 5:9) so literally that rules out any sort of
"fighting back." Thus
Rod Dreher's recent post at The American Conservative.
He's not at all convinced that pacifist options like embargoes and
negotiations will stop "religious fanatics who behead children and
crucify people for the greater glory of Allah."(his words, not mine)
Dreher concludes:
To be clear, there are plausible prudential arguments against the
United States involving itself directly in a military capacity against
ISIS. But the idea that pacifist strategies are sufficient to stop
berserkers like ISIS strikes me as crackpot. I can only imagine how this
sort of thing sounds to refugee Christians in the region.
Sometimes, war is the answer. It may not be the answer for the United States in this particular situation — I am not convinced that it is; Pat Buchanan has some wise words about US policy on this matter — but there will be no stopping ISIS without somebody
taking up arms and shooting them all. War is the answer when all other
possible answers have been tried and failed, but there really is such a
thing as just war. If war against ISIS is not a just war by Christian
standards, then what on earth is?
Now this is not the time
or place to start a long argument about American military involvement
since Vietnam. Rather, Dreher's argument represents one (and only one)
attempt to do what we're studying in our ethics course: look at a
current situation (in this case, a particularly frightening and violent
one) and, with the benefit of our own experiences plus the insights from
several traditions, discern (there's Muldoon again) a plan of action
that makes sense to ourselves and others. Sometimes the conclusions,
you see Dreher admitting, will assuredly result in death. Still,
something, something effective, must be done.
And that's it!
Remember you need only post about 150 to 250 words. Just remember, to
be polite and prudent...and cite your sources!
No comments:
Post a Comment